Gravitational waves and higher dimensions: Love numbers and Kaluza-Klein excitations
Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, Christopher J. Moore

TL;DR
This paper explores how gravitational-wave data constrains higher-dimensional theories with extra dimensions, finding that such models are largely unconstrained and that Kaluza-Klein modes are suppressed, with revised calculations of black hole Love numbers.
Contribution
It demonstrates that higher-dimensional models with flat extra dimensions are not constrained by gravitational-wave observations and provides new calculations of black hole Love numbers in higher dimensions.
Findings
KK modes are highly suppressed and not excited in typical GW signals.
Gravitational-wave data do not constrain models with flat large extra dimensions.
Recomputed Love numbers differ in magnitude and sign from previous results.
Abstract
Gravitational-wave (GW) observations provide a wealth of information on the nature and properties of black holes. Among these, tidal Love numbers or the multipole moments of the inspiralling and final objects are key to a number of constraints. Here, we consider these observations in the context of higher-dimensional scenarios, with flat large extra dimensions. We show that -- as might be anticipated, but not always appreciated in the literature -- physically motivated set-ups are unconstrained by gravitational-wave data. Dynamical processes that do not excite the Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes lead to a signal identical to that in four-dimensional general relativity in vacuum . In addition, any possible excitation of the KK modes is highly suppressed relative to the dominant quadrupolar term; given existing constraints on the extra dimensions and the masses of the objects seen in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
