Analysis of the H.E.S.S. public data release with ctools
J\"urgen Kn\"odlseder, Luigi Tibaldo, Domenico Tiziani, Andreas, Specovius, Josh Cardenzana, Michael Mayer, Nathan Kelley-Hoskins, Leonardo Di, Venere, Simon Bonnefoy, Andreas Ziegler, Stefan Eschbach, Pierrick Martin,, Thierry Louge, Francois Brun, Maria Haupt, Rolf B\"uhler

TL;DR
This paper validates the ctools software for analyzing real H.E.S.S. data, demonstrating its accuracy and multi-wavelength capabilities, and confirming its readiness for current and future IACT data analysis.
Contribution
The study provides the first validation of ctools with real H.E.S.S. data and showcases its multi-wavelength analysis capabilities with Fermi-LAT.
Findings
Good agreement between ctools and H.E.S.S. published results
Development of a parametric background model for IACT data
Successful joint analysis of H.E.S.S. and Fermi-LAT data
Abstract
The ctools open-source software package was developed for the scientific analysis of astronomical data from Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs), such as H.E.S.S., VERITAS, MAGIC, and the future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). To date, the software has been mainly tested using simulated CTA data; however, upon the public release of a small set of H.E.S.S. observations of the Crab nebula, MSH 15-52, RX J1713.7-3946, and PKS 2155-304 validation using real data is now possible. We analysed the data of the H.E.S.S. public data release using ctools version 1.6 and compared our results to those published by the H.E.S.S. Collaboration for the respective sources. We developed a parametric background model that satisfactorily describes the expected background rate as a function of reconstructed energy and direction for each observation. We used that model, and tested all analysis methods…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
