TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework for generating attainable counterfactual explanations for tabular data, ensuring suggestions are realistic and close to actual data points by leveraging manifold learning and a new quality measure.
Contribution
It proposes a novel criterion for counterfactual difficulty and develops C-CHVAE, a model that produces feasible counterfactuals within high-density data regions.
Findings
Counterfactual suggestions are more attainable and realistic.
The framework improves the faithfulness of counterfactual explanations.
Experimental results demonstrate enhanced quality of generated counterfactuals.
Abstract
Counterfactual explanations can be obtained by identifying the smallest change made to a feature vector to qualitatively influence a prediction; for example, from 'loan rejected' to 'awarded' or from 'high risk of cardiovascular disease' to 'low risk'. Previous approaches often emphasized that counterfactuals should be easily interpretable to humans, motivating sparse solutions with few changes to the feature vectors. However, these approaches would not ensure that the produced counterfactuals be proximate (i.e., not local outliers) and connected to regions with substantial data density (i.e., close to correctly classified observations), two requirements known as counterfactual faithfulness. These requirements are fundamental when making suggestions to individuals that are indeed attainable. Our contribution is twofold. On one hand, we suggest to complement the catalogue of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsCounterfactuals Explanations · Solana Customer Service Number +1-833-534-1729
