Towards Empirically Validated Remedies for Scrum Retrospective Headaches
Christoph Matthies, Franziska Dobrigkeit

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of eleven retrospective activities in Scrum, through case studies, revealing benefits in reducing common headaches but also uncovering new challenges.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the impact of specific retrospective activities on Scrum headaches, highlighting both benefits and unintended consequences.
Findings
Most activities reduced common headaches in case studies
Some activities introduced new challenges or headaches
Evidence supports targeted use of retrospective activities
Abstract
Agile methods, especially Scrum, have become staples of the modern software development industry. Retrospective meetings are Scrum's instrument for process improvement and adaptation. They are considered one of the most important aspects of the Scrum method and its implementation in organizations. However, Retrospectives face their own challenges. Agile practitioners have highlighted common problems, i.e. headaches, that repeatedly appear in meetings and negatively impact the quality of process improvement efforts. To remedy these headaches, Retrospective activities, which can help teams think together and break the usual routine, have been proposed. In this research, we present case studies of educational and industry teams, investigating the effects of eleven Retrospective activities on five identified headaches. While we find evidence for the claimed benefits of activities in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
