The Mass-Metallicity Relation at $z\sim0.8$: Redshift Evolution and Parameter Dependency
Chi Huang, Hu Zou, Xu Kong, Johan Comparat, Zesen Lin, Yulong Gao,, Zhixiong Liang, Timothee Delubac, Anand Raichoor, Jean-Paul Kneib, Donald P., Schneider, Xu Zhou, Qirong Yuan, Matthew A. Bershady

TL;DR
This study analyzes the mass-metallicity relation at redshift around 0.8 using SDSS eBOSS data, revealing its evolution and dependency on galaxy properties like SFR and size, and comparing it to the local fundamental metallicity relation.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the MZR at z~0.8, highlighting its evolution and key dependencies on galaxy parameters, and assesses its consistency with the local FMR.
Findings
MZR shows downward evolution from local to high redshift.
Higher SFR and larger half-light radius correlate with lower metallicity.
MZR strongly depends on SFR and roughly follows the local FMR.
Abstract
The spectra of emission-line galaxies (ELGs) from the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) of the Sloan Digit Sky Survey (SDSS) are used to study the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) at . The selected sample contains about 180,000 massive star-forming galaxies with and . The spectra are stacked in bins of different parameters including redshift, stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), specific star formation rate (sSFR), half-light radius, mass density, and optical color. The average MZR at has a downward evolution in the MZR from local to high-redshift universe, which is consistent with previous works. At a specified stellar mass, galaxies with higher SFR/sSFR and larger half-light radius have systematically lower metallicity. This behavior is reversed for galaxies with larger mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
