Electron-phonon and electron-electron interaction effects in twisted bilayer graphene
Sankar Das Sarma, Fengcheng Wu

TL;DR
This paper critically compares continuum many-body theories with experimental data on twisted bilayer graphene, revealing limitations of perturbative approaches and highlighting the potential of nonperturbative methods for understanding electron interactions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive critical analysis of electron-phonon and electron-electron interactions in tBLG, emphasizing the failure of leading-order perturbative theories and suggesting alternative nonperturbative approaches.
Findings
Perturbative 1-loop RG theory fails for strong-coupling electron-electron interactions.
Nonperturbative methods like Borel-Padé and 1/N expansion align better with experiments.
Leading-order continuum theory describes electron-phonon interactions well except near van Hove singularities.
Abstract
By comparing with recently available experimental data from several groups, we critically discuss the manifestation of continuum many body interaction effects in twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG) with small twist angles and low carrier densities, which arise naturally within the Dirac cone approximation for the non-interacting band structure. We provide two specific examples of such continuum many body theories: one involving electron-phonon interaction and one involving electron-electron interaction. In both cases, the experimental findings are only partially quantitatively consistent with rather clear-cut leading-order theoretical predictions based on well-established continuum many body theories. We provide a critical discussion, based mainly on the currently available tBLG experimental data, on possible future directions for understanding many body renormalization involving…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
