On the Physical Meaning of Time-Domain Constitutive Models with Complex Parameters
Nicos Makris

TL;DR
This paper critically examines time-domain constitutive models with complex parameters, demonstrating they lack physical realizability and are only effective in frequency domain modeling of viscoelastic materials.
Contribution
It clarifies the physical limitations of complex-parameter models and shows that real-valued parameters are necessary for physically meaningful constitutive models.
Findings
Complex-parameter models are not physically realizable.
Relaxation modulus of complex-coefficient Maxwell model diverges at positive times.
Frequency-domain efficiency does not imply physical validity.
Abstract
This paper revisits the physical meaning of linear, time-domain constitutive models with complex parameters that have been presented in the literature and concludes that such models are not physically realizable. While complex-parameter phenomenological models (including those with complex-order time derivatives) may be efficient in capturing in the frequency domain the frequency-dependent behavior of viscoelastic materials over a finite frequency band, they do not possess physically acceptable time-response functions. The paper first reviews the intimate relation between the causality of a physically realizable constitutive model and the analyticity of its frequency-response function and explains that in theory it is sufficient to conduct a nonlinear regression analysis for estimating the model parameters either on only the real part or on only the imaginary part of its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
