The Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: clustering dependence of Type 2 AGN on host galaxy properties
V. Allevato, A. Viitanen, A. Finoguenov, F. Civano, H. Suh, F., Shankar, A. Bongiorno, A. Ferrara, R. Gilli, T. Miyaji, S. Marchesi, N., Cappelluti, M. Salvato

TL;DR
This study investigates how the clustering of Type 2 AGN depends on host galaxy properties like stellar mass, star formation rate, and black hole accretion rate, revealing a negative correlation with SFR but no dependence on stellar mass or accretion rate.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of clustering dependence on multiple host galaxy properties for X-ray selected Type 2 AGN across a broad redshift range.
Findings
Lower SFR AGN are found in richer environments.
No significant dependence of clustering on stellar mass or BHAR.
Mock catalogs successfully reproduce observed relations assuming satellite AGN fraction of 15%.
Abstract
Aims. We perform clustering measurements of 800 X-ray selected Chandra COSMOS Legacy (CCL) Type 2 AGN with known spectroscopic redshift to probe the halo mass dependence on AGN host galaxy properties, such as galaxy stellar mass Mstar, star formation rate (SFR) and specific black hole accretion rate (BHAR), in the redshift range z = [0 - 3]. Methods. We split the sample of AGN with known spectroscopic redshits according to Mstar, SFR and specific BHAR, while matching the distributions in terms of the other parameters, including redshift. We measure the projected two-point correlation function wp(rp) and model it with the 2-halo term to derive the large-scale bias b and the corresponding typical mass of the hosting halo, for the different subsamples. Results. We found no significant dependence of the large-scale bias and typical halo mass on galaxy stellar mass and specific BHAR for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
