
TL;DR
This paper argues that quantum mechanics is a human-made mathematical model and explores how features of our world lead to its development, emphasizing that quantization results in wave and statistical behaviors.
Contribution
It offers a perspective that quantum mechanics is a model reflecting our world, not an inherent truth, and explains how quantization influences wave and statistical phenomena.
Findings
Quantum mechanics is a human invention, not an absolute description.
Discrete quanta lead to wave and statistical behaviors.
The perspective shifts focus from theory implications to world features.
Abstract
After the development of a self-consistent quantum formalism nearly a century ago, there ensued a quest to understand the often counterintuitive predictions of the theory. These endeavors invariably begin with the assumption of the "truth" of the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics and then proceed to investigate the theory's implications for the physical world. One of the outcomes has been endless discussions of the quantum measurement problem, wave/particle duality, the non-locality of entangled quantum states, Schroedinger's cat, and other philosophical conundrums. In this essay, I take the point of view that quantum mechanics is a mathematical model, a human invention, and rather than pondering what the theory implies about our world, I consider the transposed question: what is it about our world that leads us to a quantum mechanical model of it? One consequence is the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
