Ephemeral Astroturfing Attacks: The Case of Fake Twitter Trends
Tu\u{g}rulcan Elmas, Rebekah Overdorf, Ahmed Furkan \"Ozkalay, Karl, Aberer

TL;DR
This paper reveals a widespread and previously unknown form of social media manipulation called ephemeral astroturfing, where fake trends are artificially promoted and then removed, undermining platform integrity.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of ephemeral astroturfing attacks, demonstrates their prevalence on Twitter, and quantifies their impact on trending topics.
Findings
Over 19,000 fake trends detected
More than 108,000 accounts involved
At least 20% of top global trends affected
Abstract
We uncover a previously unknown, ongoing astroturfing attack on the popularity mechanisms of social media platforms: ephemeral astroturfing attacks. In this attack, a chosen keyword or topic is artificially promoted by coordinated and inauthentic activity to appear popular, and, crucially, this activity is removed as part of the attack. We observe such attacks on Twitter trends and find that these attacks are not only successful but also pervasive. We detected over 19,000 unique fake trends promoted by over 108,000 accounts, including not only fake but also compromised accounts, many of which remained active and continued participating in the attacks. Trends astroturfed by these attacks account for at least 20% of the top 10 global trends. Ephemeral astroturfing threatens the integrity of popularity mechanisms on social media platforms and by extension the integrity of the platforms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
