Towards a Co-Design Framework for Future Mobility Systems

TL;DR

This paper introduces a modular co-design framework for future mobility systems that integrates autonomous vehicles and public transit, enabling systematic analysis of costs, benefits, and policy options.

Contribution

It develops a novel, system-level co-design framework for intermodal mobility systems, incorporating multiple objectives and real-world case studies.

Findings

Framework effectively models AV and transit system interactions.

Case study demonstrates practical policy analysis for Washington D.C.

Tools can assist policymakers in evaluating mobility interventions.

Abstract

The design of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) and the design of AVs-enabled mobility systems are closely coupled. Indeed, knowledge about the intended service of AVs would impact their design and deployment process, whilst insights about their technological development could significantly affect transportation management decisions. This calls for tools to study such a coupling and co-design AVs and AVs-enabled mobility systems in terms of different objectives. In this paper, we instantiate a framework to address such co-design problems. In particular, we leverage the recently developed theory of co-design to frame and solve the problem of designing and deploying an intermodal Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand system, whereby AVs service travel demands jointly with public transit, in terms of fleet sizing, vehicle autonomy, and public transit service frequency. Our framework is modular and compositional, allowing to describe the design problem as the interconnection of its individual components and to tackle it from a system-level perspective. Moreover, it only requires very general monotonicity assumptions and it naturally handles multiple objectives, delivering the rational solutions on the Pareto front and thus enabling policy makers to select a solution through political criteria. To showcase our methodology, we present a real-world case study for Washington D.C., USA. Our work suggests that it is possible to create user-friendly optimization tools to systematically assess the costs and benefits of interventions, and that such analytical techniques might gain a momentous role in policy-making in the future.