An ALMA survey of the SCUBA-2 CLS UDS field: Physical properties of 707 Sub-millimetre Galaxies
U. Dudzevi\v{c}i\=ut\.e, Ian Smail, A. M. Swinbank, S. M. Stach, O., Almaini, E. da Cunha, Fang Xia An, V. Arumugam, J. Birkin, A. W. Blain, S. C., Chapman, C.-C. Chen, C. J. Conselice, K. E. K. Coppin, J. S. Dunlop, D., Farrah, J. E. Geach, B. Gullberg, W. G. Hartley

TL;DR
This study analyzes 707 sub-millimetre galaxies using ALMA data, revealing their physical properties, redshift distribution, and potential evolutionary links to massive galaxies, with no significant change in dust temperature across redshifts 1.5-4.
Contribution
First large, homogeneous ALMA survey of SMGs providing detailed physical properties and evolutionary insights into massive galaxy formation.
Findings
Median redshift of SMGs is 2.61.
No evolution in dust temperature at constant FIR luminosity from z~1.5 to 4.
SMGs likely represent a phase in the formation of massive, bulge-dominated galaxies.
Abstract
We analyse the physical properties of a large, homogeneously selected sample of ALMA-located sub-mm galaxies (SMGs). This survey, AS2UDS, identified 707 SMGs across the ~1 sq.deg. field, including ~17 per cent, which are undetected at >~25.7 mag. We interpret their ultraviolet-to-radio data using MAGPHYS and determine a median redshift of z=2.61+-0.08 (1 range of z=1.8-3.4) with just ~6 per cent at z>4. Our survey provides a sample of massive dusty galaxies at z>~1, with median dust and stellar masses of =(6.8+-0.3)x10M (thus, gas masses of ~10M) and (1.26+-0.05)x10M. We find no evolution in dust temperature at a constant far-infrared luminosity across z~1.5-4. The gas mass function of our sample increases to z~2-3 and then declines at z>3. The space density and masses of SMGs suggest that almost all galaxies with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
