TL;DR
This paper investigates how different economic activities and industries scale with city size, revealing that localized industries show superlinear growth while overall urban productivity remains constant, emphasizing the importance of intra-city organization.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence distinguishing localization and urbanization economies, highlighting the role of industry-specific organization in urban scaling behaviors.
Findings
High-income knowledge occupations show increasing returns to scale.
Total city incomes exhibit constant returns to scale when considering diverse occupations.
Industrial organization, not population size, largely explains productivity variations.
Abstract
We study the scaling of (i) numbers of workers and aggregate incomes by occupational categories against city size, and (ii) total incomes against numbers of workers in different occupations, across the functional metropolitan areas of Australia and the US. The number of workers and aggregate incomes in specific high income knowledge economy related occupations and industries show increasing returns to scale by city size, showing that localization economies within particular industries account for superlinear effects. However, when total urban area incomes and/or Gross Domestic Products are regressed using a generalised Cobb-Douglas function against the number of workers in different occupations as labour inputs, constant returns to scale in productivity against city size are observed. This implies that the urbanization economies at the whole city level show linear scaling or constant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
