Reference Database for Photon Strength Functions
S. Goriely, P. Dimitriou, M. Wiedeking, T. Belgya, R. Firestone, J., Kopecky, M. Krticka, V. Plujko, R. Schwengner, S. Siem, H. Utsunomiya, S., Hilaire, S. Peru, Y. S. Cho, D. M. Filipescu, N. Iwamoto, T. Kawano, V., Varlamov, R. Xu

TL;DR
This paper compiles and assesses experimental photon strength function data across various energies, providing recommended models and a database to support nuclear physics applications and address data discrepancies.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive evaluation of existing photon strength function data and introduces a unified database with recommended models for the entire energy range.
Findings
Compiled and assessed experimental data from giant dipole resonance to below neutron separation energy.
Provided recommended models that fit most experimental data.
Established a publicly accessible PSF database at IAEA.
Abstract
Photon strength functions describing the average response of the nucleus to an electromagnetic probe are key input information in the theoretical modelling of nuclear reactions. Consequently they are important for a wide range of fields such as nuclear structure, nuclear astrophysics, medical isotope production, fission and fusion reactor technologies. They are also sources of information for widely used reaction libraries such as the IAEA Reference Input Parameter Library and evaluated data files such as EGAF. In the past two decades, the amount of reaction gamma-ray data measured to determine photon strength functions has grown rapidly. Different experimental techniques have led to discrepant results and users are faced with the dilemma which (if any) of the divergent data to adopt. We report on a coordinated effort to compile and assess the existing experimental data on photon…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
