\texttt{code::proof}: Prepare for \emph{most} weather conditions
Charles T. Gray

TL;DR
This paper introduces exttt{code::proof}, a practical workflow for creating reproducible research compendia with unit tests, aimed at simplifying complex data analysis processes and ensuring confidence in computational results.
Contribution
It presents a toolchain walkthrough for setting up reproducible research environments with unit tests, complementing proof-based approaches for reliable data analysis.
Findings
Provides a practical method for reproducible research setup
Enhances confidence in computational algorithms through unit testing
Addresses complex integration of data analysis tools
Abstract
Computational tools for data analysis are being released daily on repositories such as the Comprehensive R Archive Network. How we integrate these tools to solve a problem in research is increasingly complex and requiring frequent updates. To mitigate these \emph{Kafkaesque} computational challenges in research, this manuscript proposes \emph{toolchain walkthrough}, an opinionated documentation of a scientific workflow. As a practical complement to our proof-based argument~(Gray and Marwick, arXiv, 2019) for reproducible data analysis, here we focus on the practicality of setting up a reproducible research compendia, with unit tests, as a measure of \texttt{code::proof}, confidence in computational algorithms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Data Analysis with R · Data Visualization and Analytics
