On Siegel's problem for E-functions
S. Fischler (LMO), T. Rivoal (IF)

TL;DR
This paper investigates Siegel's problem on E-functions, showing that a positive answer would imply unlikely restrictions on the values of G-functions, thus suggesting a negative answer is more probable.
Contribution
It proves that if Siegel's question is positive, then G-function values are contained in a small algebraic ring, indicating the question is likely negative.
Findings
Any G-function value is a coefficient in an E-function's asymptotic expansion.
Coefficients of hypergeometric E-functions with rational parameters lie in a small algebraic ring.
Coefficients of G-functions' asymptotic expansions are also in this ring.
Abstract
Siegel defined in 1929 two classes of power series, the E-functions and G-functions, which generalize the Diophantine properties of the exponential and logarithmic functions respectively. In 1949, he asked whether any E-function can be represented as a polynomial with algebraic coefficients in a finite number of hypergeometric E-functions with rational parameters. The case of E-functions of differential order less than 2 was settled in the affirmative by Gorelov in 2004, but Siegel's question is open for higher order. We prove here that if Siegel's question has a positive answer, then the ring G of values taken by analytic continuations of G-functions at algebraic points must be a subring of the relatively "small" ring H generated by algebraic numbers, and the values of the derivatives of the Gamma function at rational points. Because that inclusion seems unlikely (and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
