Magnetic helicity budget of solar active regions prolific of eruptive and confined flares
J. K. Thalmann, K. Moraitis, L. Linan, E. Pariat, G. Valori, K., Dalmasse

TL;DR
This study compares magnetic energy and helicity in two solar active regions to identify proxies that can predict eruptive potential, finding that the ratio of current-carrying to total helicity is a strong indicator of eruptivity.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the ratio of current-carrying to total helicity effectively indicates eruptive potential in solar active regions, validated through high-confidence coronal magnetic field models.
Findings
The ratio |H_J|/|H_V| indicates eruptive potential.
Total relative helicity normalized to magnetic flux does not predict eruptivity.
The proxies tested do not predict flare magnitude or type.
Abstract
We compare the coronal magnetic energy and helicity of two solar active regions (ARs), prolific in major eruptive (AR~11158) and confined (AR~12192) flaring, and analyze the potential of deduced proxies to forecast upcoming flares. Based on nonlinear force-free (NLFF) coronal magnetic field models with a high degree of solenoidality, and applying three different computational methods to investigate the coronal magnetic helicity, we are able to draw conclusions with a high level of confidence. Based on real observations of two solar ARs we checked trends regarding the potential eruptivity of the active-region corona, as suggested earlier in works that were based on numerical simulations, or solar observations. Our results support that the ratio of current-carrying to total helicity, , shows a strong ability to indicate the eruptive potential of a solar AR.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
