Design- and Model-Based Approaches to Small-Area Estimation in a Low and Middle Income Country Context: Comparisons and Recommendations
John Paige, Geir-Arne Fuglstad, Andrea Riebler, Jon Wakefield

TL;DR
This study evaluates different small-area estimation methods using simulated and real data from Kenya, highlighting the importance of accounting for survey design and introducing a novel spatial smoothing model for improved inference.
Contribution
It compares traditional and new modeling approaches for small-area estimation in low and middle income countries, including a novel spatial smoothing prior.
Findings
Including stratification and cluster effects improves predictions.
Spatially smoothed estimates are robust to priors and survey design.
Continuous spatial models perform well with fine-scale variation.
Abstract
The need for rigorous and timely health and demographic summaries has provided the impetus for an explosion in geographic studies, with a common approach being the production of pixel-level maps, particularly in low and middle income countries. In this context, household surveys are a major source of data, usually with a two-stage cluster design with stratification by region and urbanicity. Accurate estimates are of crucial interest for precision public health policy interventions, but many current studies take a cavalier approach to acknowledging the sampling design, while presenting results at a fine geographic scale. In this paper we investigate the extent to which accounting for sample design can affect predictions at the aggregate level, which is usually the target of inference. We describe a simulation study in which realistic sampling frames are created for Kenya, based on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
