Demisability and survivability sensitivity to design-for-demise techniques
Mirko Trisolini, Hugh G. Lewis, Camilla Colombo

TL;DR
This paper develops models to evaluate how design-for-demise techniques affect both the demisability and survivability of spacecraft components, highlighting their competing influences and providing tools for optimized design decisions.
Contribution
It introduces two models and indices to assess the impact of design-for-demise solutions on demisability and survivability, enabling independent and combined analysis.
Findings
Design parameters can simultaneously influence demisability and survivability.
Maps are created to visualize the effects of design choices on both indices.
Design-for-demise solutions can improve one aspect while degrading the other.
Abstract
The paper is concerned with examining the effects that design-for-demise solutions can have not only on the demisability of components, but also on their survivability that is their capability to withstand impacts from space debris. First two models are introduced. A demisability model to predict the behaviour of spacecraft components during the atmospheric re-entry and a survivability model to assess the vulnerability of spacecraft structures against space debris impacts. Two indices that evaluate the level of demisability and survivability are also proposed. The two models are then used to study the sensitivity of the demisability and of the survivability indices as a function of typical design-for-demise options. The demisability and the survivability can in fact be influenced by the same design parameters in a competing fashion that is while the demisability is improved, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
