The JETSCAPE framework: p+p results
A. Kumar, Y. Tachibana, D. Pablos, C. Sirimanna, R. J. Fries, A., Angerami, S. A. Bass, S. Cao, Y. Chen, J. Coleman, L. Cunqueiro, T. Dai, L., Du, H. Elfner, D. Everett, W. Fan, C. Gale, Y. He, U. Heinz, B. V. Jacak, P., M. Jacobs, 15 S. Jeon, K. Kauder, W. Ke, E. Khalaj

TL;DR
The paper introduces the PP19 tune of the JETSCAPE framework, validating its performance against p+p collision data across various observables to establish a reliable baseline for nuclear collision studies.
Contribution
It presents a new PP19 tune for JETSCAPE and demonstrates its accuracy in reproducing p+p collision measurements, enhancing its utility for nuclear collision research.
Findings
JETSCAPE PP19 agrees with p+p data across energies
Framework accurately reproduces jet and hadron observables
Provides benchmarks for future nuclear collision simulations
Abstract
The JETSCAPE framework is a modular and versatile Monte Carlo software package for the simulation of high energy nuclear collisions. In this work we present a new tune of JETSCAPE, called PP19, and validate it by comparison to jet-based measurements in collisions, including inclusive single jet cross sections, jet shape observables, fragmentation functions, charged hadron cross sections, and dijet mass cross sections. These observables in collisions provide the baseline for their counterparts in nuclear collisions. Quantifying the level of agreement of JETSCAPE results with data is thus necessary for meaningful applications of JETSCAPE to A+A collisions. The calculations use the JETSCAPE PP19 tune, defined in this paper, based on version 1.0 of the JETSCAPE framework. For the observables discussed in this work calculations using JETSCAPE PP19 agree with data over a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
