The chaotic wind of WR 40 as probed by BRITE
Tahina Ramiaramanantsoa, Richard Ignace, Anthony F. J. Moffat, Nicole, St-Louis, Evgenya L. Shkolnik, Adam Popowicz, Rainer Kuschnig, Andrzej, Pigulski, Gregg A. Wade, Gerald Handler, Herbert Pablo, Konstanze Zwintz

TL;DR
This study investigates the complex, stochastic wind variability of Wolf-Rayet star WR 40 using BRITE satellite photometry, proposing a clumpy wind model with power-law size distribution that explains observed light fluctuations.
Contribution
It introduces a stochastic clumpy wind model with power-law size distribution to explain WR 40's photometric variability, supported by simulated light curves matching observations.
Findings
Light variability dominated by transient, low-frequency signals.
Clump size distribution likely follows a negative power-law.
Simulated light curves resemble observed data well.
Abstract
Among Wolf-Rayet stars, those of subtype WN8 are the intrinsically most variable. We have explored the long-term photometric variability of the brightest known WN8 star, WR 40, through four contiguous months of time-resolved, single-passband optical photometry with the BRIght Target Explorer (BRITE) nanosatellite mission. The Fourier transform of the observed light-curve reveals that the strong light variability exhibited by WR 40 is dominated by many randomly-triggered, transient, low-frequency signals. We establish a model in which the whole wind consists of stochastic clumps following an outflow visibility promptly rising to peak brightness upon clump emergence from the optically thick pseudo-photosphere in the wind, followed by a gradual decay according to the right-half of a Gaussian. Free electrons in each clump scatter continuum light from the star. We explore a scenario where…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
