Osmates on the verge of a Hund's-Mott transition: The different fates of NaOsO$_3$ and LiOsO$_3$
Daniel Springer, Bongjae Kim, Peitao Liu, Sergii Khmelevskyi, Severino, Adler, Massimo Capone, Giorgio Sangiovanni, Cesare Franchini, Alessandro, Toschi

TL;DR
This paper investigates why NaOsO$_3$ and LiOsO$_3$, despite their similarities, exhibit vastly different spectroscopic behaviors by analyzing their proximity to a Hund's-Mott insulating phase using first-principles many-body methods.
Contribution
It reveals that the different properties of these compounds are due to their proximity to a Hund's-Mott transition influenced by intraorbital repulsion and Hund's exchange.
Findings
NaOsO$_3$ and LiOsO$_3$ are near a Hund's-Mott insulating phase.
Small material differences cause sharp changes in electronic mobility.
The physics is driven by cooperative intraorbital repulsion and Hund's exchange.
Abstract
We clarify the origin of the strikingly different spectroscopic properties of the chemically similar compounds NaOsO and LiOsO. Our first-principle many-body analysis demonstrates that the highly sensitive physics of these two materials is controlled by their proximity to an adjacent Hund's-Mott insulating phase. In mildly correlated oxides, this physics is triggered by the {\sl cooperative} action of intraorbital repulsion and Hund's exchange in half-filled outer-shells. Small material-specific details hence result in an extremely sharp change of the electronic mobility, explaining the surprisingly different properties of the paramagnetic high-temperature phases of the two compounds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
