The most luminous blue quasars at $3.0<z<3.3$. I. A tale of two X-ray populations
E. Nardini, E. Lusso, G. Risaliti, S. Bisogni, F. Civano, M. Elvis, G., Fabbiano, R. Gilli, A. Marconi, F. Salvestrini, C. Vignali

TL;DR
This study analyzes 30 luminous quasars at redshift 3.0-3.3, revealing two distinct X-ray populations, with a significant fraction being unexpectedly X-ray weak, suggesting different accretion or corona states.
Contribution
First detailed X-ray spectral analysis of a homogeneous sample of luminous quasars at z~3, identifying a new population of X-ray weak quasars and proposing a physical explanation.
Findings
Most quasars have standard X-ray spectra with photon index ~1.85.
Approximately 25% of quasars are X-ray underluminous by factors of 3-10.
X-ray weak quasars show no significant absorption, implying intrinsic differences.
Abstract
(abridged) We present the X-ray analysis of a sample of 30 luminous quasars at with deep XMM-Newton observations, selected from the SDSS-DR7 to be representative of the most luminous, intrinsically blue quasar population. By construction, the sample boasts a unique degree of homogeneity in terms of optical/UV properties. In the X-rays, only four sources are too faint for a detailed spectral analysis. Neglecting a radio-loud object, the other 25 quasars are, as a whole, the most X-ray luminous ever observed, with rest-frame 2-10 keV luminosities of erg/s. The continuum photon index distribution, centred at , is in excellent agreement with those in place at lower redshift, luminosity and black-hole mass, confirming the universal nature of the X-ray emission mechanism in quasars. Even so, when compared against the well-known $L_{\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
