Luminous Type II supernovae for their low expansion velocities
\'O. Rodr\'iguez, G. Pignata, J. P. Anderson, T. J. Moriya, A., Clocchiatti, F. F\"orster, J. L. Prieto, M. M. Phillips, C. R. Burns, C., Contreras, G. Folatelli, C. P. Guti\'errez, M. Hamuy, N. I. Morrell, M. D., Stritzinger, N. B. Suntzeff, S. Benetti, E. Cappellaro

TL;DR
This paper studies a subset of luminous Type II supernovae with low expansion velocities, revealing that ejecta-CSM interaction significantly influences their spectral and photometric properties, and estimating their rarity among all SNe II.
Contribution
It identifies and characterizes a new class of luminous SNe II with low expansion velocities driven by ejecta-CSM interaction, providing insights into their properties and frequency.
Findings
LLEV SNe II are 2-4% of all normal SNe II.
Ejecta-CSM interaction lasts 4-11 weeks post explosion.
Interaction dominates spectral features over progenitor metallicity.
Abstract
We present optical and near-IR data of three Type II supernovae (SNe II), SN 2008bm, SN 2009aj, and SN 2009au. These SNe display the following common characteristics: signs of early interaction of the ejecta with circumstellar material (CSM), blue colours, weakness of metal lines, low expansion velocities, and -band absolute magnitudes 2-3 mag brighter than those expected for normal SNe II based on their expansion velocities. Two more SNe reported in the literature (SN 1983K and LSQ13fn) share properties similar to our sample. Analysing this set of five SNe II, which are luminous for their low expansion velocities (LLEV), we find that their properties can be reproduced assuming ejecta-CSM interaction that lasts between 4-11 weeks post explosion. The contribution of this interaction to the radiation field seems to be the dominant component determining the observed weakness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
