A relational time-symmetric framework for analyzing the quantum computational speedup
Giuseppe Castagnoli, Eliahu Cohen, Artur Ekert, and Avshalom Elitzur

TL;DR
This paper introduces a time-symmetric, relational framework for quantum algorithms that explains the quantum speedup by considering boundary conditions and pre- and post-selection effects, providing new insights into quantum computation.
Contribution
It extends the standard quantum algorithm representation to include problem-setting and solution, highlighting the role of time symmetry and relational quantum mechanics in understanding quantum speedup.
Findings
Quantum algorithms can be viewed as influenced by both initial and final boundary conditions.
The framework shows that Alice effectively has partial advanced knowledge, explaining the speedup.
The approach applies to various quantum algorithms, elucidating their efficiency.
Abstract
The usual representation of quantum algorithms is limited to the process of solving the problem. We extend it to the process of setting the problem. Bob, the problem setter, selects a problem-setting by the initial measurement. Alice, the problem solver, unitarily computes the corresponding solution and reads it by the final measurement. This simple extension creates a new perspective from which to see the quantum algorithm. First, it highlights the relevance of time-symmetric quantum mechanics to quantum computation: the problem-setting and problem solution, in their quantum version, constitute pre- and post-selection, hence the process as a whole is bound to be affected by both boundary conditions. Second, it forces us to enter into relational quantum mechanics. There must be a representation of the quantum algorithm with respect to Bob, and another one with respect to Alice, from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
