The Relationship Between Galaxy ISM and Circumgalactic Gas Metallicities

TL;DR

This study compares metallicities of the interstellar medium and circumgalactic gas in star-forming galaxies, revealing that CGM metallicities are generally lower and more variable, with implications for understanding galaxy evolution and gas flows.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed comparison of ISM and CGM metallicities in isolated star-forming galaxies at low redshift, highlighting the lack of correlation and the complexity of CGM mixing.

Findings

CGM metallicities are lower than ISM metallicities by about 1.17 dex.

No significant metallicity gradient with impact parameter or virial radius.

N(HI) may indicate accretion or outflows based on axis alignment.

Abstract

We present ISM and CGM metallicities for 25 absorption systems associated with isolated star-forming galaxies (<z>=0.28) with 9.4<log(M*/Msun)<10.9 and with absorption detected within 200kpc. Galaxy ISM metallicities were measured using Ha/[NII] emission lines from Keck/ESI spectra. CGM single-phase low-ionization metallicities were modeled using MCMC and Cloudy analysis of absorption from HST/COS and Keck/HIRES or VLT/UVES quasar spectra. We find that the star-forming galaxy ISM metallicities follow the observed stellar mass metallicity relation (scatter 0.19dex). CGM metallicity shows no dependence with stellar mass and exhibits a scatter of ~2dex. All CGM metallicities are lower than the galaxy ISM metallicities and are offset by log(dZ)=-1.17+/-0.11. There is no obvious metallicity gradient as a function of impact parameter or virial radius (<2.3 sigma). There is no relationship between the relative CGM-galaxy metallicity and azimuthal angle. We find the mean metallicity differences along the major and minor axes are -1.13+/-0.18 and -1.23+/-0.11, respectively. Regardless of whether we examine our sample by low/high inclination or low/high impact parameter, or low/high N(HI), we do not find any significant relationship with relative CGM-galaxy metallicity and azimuthal angle. We find that 10/15 low column density systems (logN(HI)<17.2) reside along the galaxy major axis while high column density systems (logN(HI)>17.2) reside along the minor axis. This suggest N(HI) could be a useful indicator of accretion/outflows. We conclude that CGM is not well mixed, given the range of galaxy-CGM metallicities, and that metallicity at low redshift might not be a good tracer of CGM processes. Furthermore we should replace integrated line-of-sight, single phase, metallicities with multi-phase, cloud-cloud metallicities, which could be more indicative of the physical processes within the CGM.