Model Order Selection Based on Information Theoretic Criteria: Design of the Penalty

TL;DR

This paper develops a finite-sample design approach for the penalty in information theoretic criteria, optimizing model order selection accuracy across various statistical models.

Contribution

It introduces a general theoretical framework for designing GIC penalties in finite samples, balancing over- and underestimation risks, with analytical derivations for specific problems.

Findings

Optimized GIC penalty reduces model order estimation errors.

Analytical formulas for penalties improve over traditional AIC and BIC.

Method demonstrates effectiveness through performance comparisons.

Abstract

Information theoretic criteria (ITC) have been widely adopted in engineering and statistics for selecting, among an ordered set of candidate models, the one that better fits the observed sample data. The selected model minimizes a penalized likelihood metric, where the penalty is determined by the criterion adopted. While rules for choosing a penalty that guarantees a consistent estimate of the model order are known, theoretical tools for its design with finite samples have never been provided in a general setting. In this paper, we study model order selection for finite samples under a design perspective, focusing on the generalized information criterion (GIC), which embraces the most common ITC. The theory is general, and as case studies we consider: a) the problem of estimating the number of signals embedded in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) by using multiple sensors; b) model selection for the general linear model (GLM), which includes e.g. the problem of estimating the number of sinusoids in AWGN. The analysis reveals a trade-off between the probabilities of overestimating and underestimating the order of the model. We then propose to design the GIC penalty to minimize underestimation while keeping the overestimation probability below a specified level. For the considered problems, this method leads to analytical derivation of the optimal penalty for a given sample size. A performance comparison between the penalty optimized GIC and common AIC and BIC is provided, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed design strategy.