Why there are no mappings to infinity under the Collatz map (and similar)
M.J. Wensink

TL;DR
This paper explores why the Collatz conjecture and similar mappings do not lead to infinite sequences, providing insights into their behavior and potential reasons for the conjecture's unresolved status.
Contribution
It offers a theoretical explanation for the absence of infinite mappings in the Collatz conjecture and its generalizations, advancing understanding of their dynamics.
Findings
No evidence of mappings to infinity under Collatz and similar functions.
Theoretical reasoning suggests inherent constraints prevent infinite trajectories.
Supports the conjecture that all sequences eventually reach 1.
Abstract
Following up on earlier work, I suggest why there are no mappings to infinity under the Collatz conjecture, nor under other mappings of the generalization , where is odd.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection
