mfEGRA: Multifidelity Efficient Global Reliability Analysis through Active Learning for Failure Boundary Location

TL;DR

mfEGRA is a multifidelity active learning method that efficiently locates failure boundaries in reliability analysis, significantly reducing computational costs by leveraging cheaper surrogate models.

Contribution

This work introduces a two-stage adaptive sampling criterion using multifidelity Gaussian process surrogates, extending EGRA for more cost-effective reliability analysis.

Findings

Achieves ~46% computational savings on an analytic test problem.

Reduces computational effort by 24-48% on acoustic horn problems.

Effective in estimating rare event probabilities with lower costs.

Abstract

This paper develops mfEGRA, a multifidelity active learning method using data-driven adaptively refined surrogates for failure boundary location in reliability analysis. This work addresses the issue of prohibitive cost of reliability analysis using Monte Carlo sampling for expensive-to-evaluate high-fidelity models by using cheaper-to-evaluate approximations of the high-fidelity model. The method builds on the Efficient Global Reliability Analysis (EGRA) method, which is a surrogate-based method that uses adaptive sampling for refining Gaussian process surrogates for failure boundary location using a single-fidelity model. Our method introduces a two-stage adaptive sampling criterion that uses a multifidelity Gaussian process surrogate to leverage multiple information sources with different fidelities. The method combines expected feasibility criterion from EGRA with one-step lookahead information gain to refine the surrogate around the failure boundary. The computational savings from mfEGRA depends on the discrepancy between the different models, and the relative cost of evaluating the different models as compared to the high-fidelity model. We show that accurate estimation of reliability using mfEGRA leads to computational savings of $\sim$46% for an analytic multimodal test problem and 24% for a three-dimensional acoustic horn problem, when compared to single-fidelity EGRA. We also show the effect of using a priori drawn Monte Carlo samples in the implementation for the acoustic horn problem, where mfEGRA leads to computational savings of 45% for the three-dimensional case and 48% for a rarer event four-dimensional case as compared to single-fidelity EGRA.