Do non-dipolar magnetic fields contribute to spin-down torques?
Victor See, Sean P. Matt, Adam J. Finley, Colin P. Folsom, Sudeshna, Boro Saikia, Jean-Francois Donati, Rim Fares, \'Elodie M. H\'ebrard, Moira M., Jardine, Sandra V. Jeffers, Stephen C. Marsden, Matthew W. Mengel, Julien, Morin, Pascal Petit, Aline A. Vidotto, Ian A. Waite

TL;DR
This study investigates whether non-dipolar magnetic field components significantly influence the spin-down torques of low-mass stars, finding that dipolar fields generally dominate unless mass-loss rates are high, with some evidence of non-dipolar contributions at large Rossby numbers.
Contribution
It introduces a method to determine when non-dipolar magnetic modes contribute to stellar spin-down based on mass-loss rates and magnetic field geometry.
Findings
Most stars' mass-loss rates are below the critical threshold, so dipolar fields suffice for spin-down calculations.
Some stars at large Rossby numbers show potential non-dipolar contributions.
The critical mass-loss rate depends on the magnetic field geometry.
Abstract
Main sequence low-mass stars are known to spin-down as a consequence of their magnetised stellar winds. However, estimating the precise rate of this spin-down is an open problem. The mass-loss rate, angular momentum-loss rate and the magnetic field properties of low-mass stars are fundamentally linked making this a challenging task. Of particular interest is the stellar magnetic field geometry. In this work, we consider whether non-dipolar field modes contribute significantly to the spin-down of low-mass stars. We do this using a sample of stars that have all been previously mapped with Zeeman-Doppler imaging. For a given star, as long as its mass-loss rate is below some critical mass-loss rate, only the dipolar fields contribute to its spin-down torque. However, if it has a larger mass-loss rate, higher order modes need to be considered. For each star, we calculate this critical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
