A Comparison Study on Nonlinear Dimension Reduction Methods with Kernel Variations: Visualization, Optimization and Classification
Katherine C. Kempfert, Yishi Wang, Cuixian Chen, and Samuel W.K. Wong

TL;DR
This paper compares various nonlinear dimension reduction methods, including kernel variants, for face image analysis and classification, demonstrating their effectiveness and proposing a parallel computational approach for faster processing.
Contribution
The study provides a comprehensive comparison of nonlinear DR techniques with kernel variations and introduces a parallel approach for improved computational efficiency in face classification.
Findings
Kernel-based DR methods achieve over 95% accuracy in gender classification.
Parallel computation significantly speeds up processing without sacrificing accuracy.
Kernel methods outperform traditional linear techniques in face recognition tasks.
Abstract
Because of high dimensionality, correlation among covariates, and noise contained in data, dimension reduction (DR) techniques are often employed to the application of machine learning algorithms. Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and their kernel variants (KPCA, KLDA) are among the most popular DR methods. Recently, Supervised Kernel Principal Component Analysis (SKPCA) has been shown as another successful alternative. In this paper, brief reviews of these popular techniques are presented first. We then conduct a comparative performance study based on three simulated datasets, after which the performance of the techniques are evaluated through application to a pattern recognition problem in face image analysis. The gender classification problem is considered on MORPH-II and FG-NET, two popular longitudinal face aging databases. Several feature…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
