
TL;DR
This paper explores modeling and computational complexity of synchronization constraints in automata, proposing three approaches and analyzing their difficulty, with implications for automata theory and practical reset sequence computation.
Contribution
It introduces three new models for constrained synchronization in automata and provides a detailed complexity classification of these problems.
Findings
Most problems are PSPACE-complete
Some variants are NP-complete or polynomial-time solvable
Upper bounds on synchronizing word length are established
Abstract
Imagine an assembly line where a box with a lid and liquid in it enters in some unknown orientation. The box should leave the line with the open lid facing upwards with the liquid still in it. To save costs there are no complex sensors or image recognition software available on the assembly line, so a reset sequence needs to be computed. But how can the dependencies of the deforming impact of a transformation of the box, such as 'do not tilt the box over when the lid is open' or 'open the lid again each time it gets closed' be modeled? We present three attempts to model constraints of these kinds on the order in which the states of an automaton are transitioned by a synchronizing word. The first two concepts relate the last visits of states and form constraints on which states still need to be reached, whereas the third concept concerns the first visits of states and forms constraints…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
