Resilient Coverage: Exploring the Local-to-Global Trade-off
Ragesh K. Ramachandran, Lifeng Zhou James A. Preiss, and Gaurav S., Sukhatme

TL;DR
This paper presents a centralized control framework for robot coverage that balances local repositioning and adding robots to maintain coverage after failures, validated through simulations and quadrotor experiments.
Contribution
It introduces a novel control framework that manages local and global coverage trade-offs in heterogeneous robot teams, including failure recovery strategies.
Findings
Local neighborhood size affects coverage recovery efficiency.
Adding robots is more effective than enlarging neighborhoods for high coverage.
Framework is validated with simulations and real quadrotor experiments.
Abstract
We propose a centralized control framework to select suitable robots from a heterogeneous pool and place them at appropriate locations to monitor a region for events of interest. In the event of a robot failure, the framework repositions robots in a user-defined local neighborhood of the failed robot to compensate for the coverage loss. The central controller augments the team with additional robots from the robot pool when simply repositioning robots fails to attain a user-specified level of desired coverage. The size of the local neighborhood around the failed robot and the desired coverage over the region are two objectives that can be manipulated to achieve a user-specified balance. We investigate the trade-off between the coverage compensation achieved through local repositioning and the computation required to plan the new robot locations. We also study the relationship between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
