A hypersurface containing the support of a Radon transform must be an ellipsoid. I
Jan Boman

TL;DR
This paper proves that if the support of a Radon transform of a compactly supported distribution is contained in the tangent planes of a boundary, then that boundary must be an ellipsoid, providing a new proof of a related theorem.
Contribution
It establishes a geometric characterization of boundaries supporting Radon transforms, specifically showing they must be ellipsoids, and offers a new proof of a recent related theorem.
Findings
Support of Radon transform implies boundary is an ellipsoid
Provides a new proof of a theorem related to Radon transforms
Connects geometric properties with Radon transform support
Abstract
If the Radon transform of a compactly supported distribution in is supported on the set of tangent planes to the boundary of a bounded convex domain , then must be an ellipsoid. As a corollary of this result we get a new proof of a recent theorem of Koldobsky, Merkurjev, and Yaskin, which settled a special case of a conjecture of Arnold that was motivated by a famous lemma of Newton.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Numerical methods in inverse problems · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
