Is Fast Adaptation All You Need?
Khurram Javed, Hengshuai Yao, Martha White

TL;DR
This paper explores alternative second-order training signals in gradient-based meta-learning, showing that minimizing interference enhances incremental learning more effectively than focusing solely on fast adaptation.
Contribution
It introduces the idea of using robustness to interference as a training signal, expanding beyond traditional fast adaptation metrics in meta-learning.
Findings
Minimizing interference leads to better incremental learning.
Representations learned with interference minimization are more robust.
Traditional fast adaptation metrics may overlook important robustness aspects.
Abstract
Gradient-based meta-learning has proven to be highly effective at learning model initializations, representations, and update rules that allow fast adaptation from a few samples. The core idea behind these approaches is to use fast adaptation and generalization -- two second-order metrics -- as training signals on a meta-training dataset. However, little attention has been given to other possible second-order metrics. In this paper, we investigate a different training signal -- robustness to catastrophic interference -- and demonstrate that representations learned by directing minimizing interference are more conducive to incremental learning than those learned by just maximizing fast adaptation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Machine Learning and ELM · Machine Learning and Data Classification
