The inner view of NGC 1052 using multiple X-ray observations

TL;DR

This study provides a multi-epoch X-ray analysis of NGC 1052, revealing a reflection component and variability in flux, spectrum, and absorption, with the first NuSTAR results reported for this prototypical LLAGN.

Contribution

First report of NuSTAR observations for NGC 1052, identifying a reflection component and comparing uniform versus clumpy absorption models.

Findings

Detection of a constant reflection component likely from the torus.

Flux, spectral slope, and absorption vary over months to years.

Clumpy absorber model is significantly more probable than uniform absorber.

Abstract

In this paper, we make a multi-epoch analysis of NGC 1052, one of the prototypical LLAGN, using XMM-Newton, Suzaku and NuSTAR observations, taken from 2001 to 2017. This is the first time that results from NuSTAR observations are reported for NGC 1052. On the technical aspects, we found a wavelength-dependent calibration issue between simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR spectra. It is described by a change on the photon index of $\rm{ \Gamma_{NuSTAR}- \Gamma_{XMM-Newton}=0.17\pm0.04}$. We use ancillary Chandra data to decontaminate the nuclear spectrum from circumnuclear contributors. We find that two baseline models can fit the broad (0.5-50 keV) X-ray spectrum of the source. One consists of a power-law like continuum which is absorbed by a uniform absorber, reflection from neutral material, and a separate power-law component in the soft band. The second model presents a clumpy absorber. The reflection component is still present, but not the soft band power-law. Instead, absorption by a warm absorber is necessary to fit the spectra. This is the first time that a reflection component is established in this object, thanks to high energy data from NuSTAR. This component is constant in flux and shape, supporting the idea that is produced away from the central source (probably the torus). We find flux, spectral slope and absorption variations on timescales of months to years. We also find that a patchy-absober can explain the behaviour of this source better as it is $\sim$ 200 times more likely than the uniform absober while it yields to smaller intrinsic variations.