The Explosion of Helium Stars Evolved With Mass Loss

TL;DR

This study models supernovae from massive helium stars with mass loss, predicting explosion energies, remnant masses, and light curves, revealing a continuous black hole and neutron star mass distribution and fainter supernovae than typical Type Ib/c events.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive grid of models for helium star supernovae including mass loss effects, predicting remnant masses, light curves, and exploring alternative explosion mechanisms like magnetars.

Findings

Black hole masses range from 9 to 11 solar masses.

Median neutron star mass is 1.35-1.38 solar masses.

Predicted supernova brightness is generally fainter than typical Type Ib/c supernovae.

Abstract

Light curves, explosion energies, and remnant masses are calculated for a grid of supernovae resulting from massive helium stars that have been evolved including mass loss. These presupernova stars should approximate the results of binary evolution for stars in interacting systems that lose their envelopes close to the time of helium core ignition. Initial helium star masses are in the range 2.5 to 40\,\Msun, which correspond to main sequence masses of about 13 to 90\,\Msun. Common Type Ib and Ic supernovae result from stars whose final masses are approximately 2.5 to 5.6\,\Msun. For heavier stars, a large fraction of collapses lead to black holes, though there is an island of explodability for presupernova masses near 10\,\Msun. The median neutron star mass in binaries is 1.35--1.38\,\Msun \ and the median black hole mass is between 9 and 11\,\Msun. Even though black holes less massive than 5 \Msun\ are rare, they are predicted down to the maximum neutron star mass. There is no empty ``gap'', only a less populated mass range. For standard assumptions regarding the explosions and nucleosynthesis, the models predict light curves that are fainter than the brighter common Type Ib and Ic supernovae. Even with a very liberal, but physically plausible increase in $^{56}$Ni production, the highest energy models are fainter, at peak, than 10$^{42.6}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$, and very few approach that limit. The median peak luminosity ranges from 10$^{42.0}$ to 10$^{42.3}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$. Possible alternatives to the standard neutrino-powered and radioactive-illuminated models are explored. Magnetars are a promising alternative. Several other unusual varieties of Type I supernovae at both high and low mass are explored.