Decoupling of Lattice and Orbital Degrees of Freedom in an Iron-Pnictide Superconductor
Christian E. Matt, O. Ivashko, M. Horio, D. Sutter, N. Dennler, J., Choi, Q. Wang, M. H. Fischer, S. Katrych, L. Forro, J. Ma, B. Fu, B. Lv, M., v. Zimmermann, T. K. Kim, N. C. Plumb, N. Xu, M. Shi, and J. Chang

TL;DR
This study uncovers a high-temperature structural phase in an iron-pnictide superconductor that coexists with superconductivity, showing that structural orthorhombic order can be decoupled from electronic nematicity, challenging existing theories.
Contribution
It reveals a new high-temperature orthorhombic phase in an iron-pnictide superconductor that is independent of electronic nematic order, providing new insights into the phase diagram and pairing mechanisms.
Findings
Discovery of a high-temperature orthorhombic phase at ~250 K.
Absence of electronic nematic order in the new phase.
Coexistence of this phase with superconductivity at 25 K.
Abstract
The interplay of structural and electronic phases in iron-based superconductors is a central theme in the search for the superconducting pairing mechanism. While electronic nematicity, defined as the breaking of four-fold symmetry triggered by electronic degrees of freedom, is competing with superconductivity, the effect of purely structural orthorhombic order is unexplored. Here, using x-ray diffraction (XRD), we reveal a new structural orthorhombic phase with an exceptionally high onset temperature ( K), which coexists with superconductivity ( K), in an electron-doped iron-pnictide superconductor far from the underdoped region. Furthermore, our angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements demonstrate the absence of electronic nematic order as the driving mechanism, in contrast to other underdoped iron pnictides where…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
