Physical Design Obfuscation of Hardware: A Comprehensive Investigation of Device- and Logic-Level Techniques
Arunkumar Vijayakumar, Vinay C. Patil, Daniel E. Holcomb and, Christof Paar, Sandip Kundu

TL;DR
This paper systematically investigates physical design obfuscation techniques at device and logic levels to enhance hardware security against reverse engineering, providing a taxonomy, review, and new methods.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive categorization of physical obfuscation techniques, reviews existing methods, and introduces new device and logic-level obfuscation techniques with feasibility and detection analysis.
Findings
Physical obfuscation techniques vary across design stages.
A new taxonomy aids systematic treatment of obfuscation methods.
Proposed techniques show potential for effective hardware security.
Abstract
The threat of hardware reverse engineering is a growing concern for a large number of applications. A main defense strategy against reverse engineering is hardware obfuscation. In this paper, we investigate physical obfuscation techniques, which perform alterations of circuit elements that are difficult or impossible for an adversary to observe. The examples of such stealthy manipulations are changes in the doping concentrations or dielectric manipulations. An attacker will, thus, extract a netlist, which does not correspond to the logic function of the device-under-attack. This approach of camouflaging has garnered recent attention in the literature. In this paper, we expound on this promising direction to conduct a systematic end-to-end study of the VLSI design process to find multiple ways to obfuscate a circuit for hardware security. This paper makes three major contributions.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
