Stabilizing Generative Adversarial Networks: A Survey
Maciej Wiatrak, Stefano V. Albrecht, Andrew Nystrom

TL;DR
This survey reviews various methods developed to stabilize the training of Generative Adversarial Networks, addressing issues like non-convergence and mode collapse, and compares their effectiveness and limitations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview and comparison of existing stabilization techniques for GAN training, highlighting open challenges.
Findings
Different stabilization methods have varying effectiveness and trade-offs.
No single approach completely solves GAN training instability.
Open problems remain in achieving robust and scalable GAN training.
Abstract
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are a type of generative model which have received much attention due to their ability to model complex real-world data. Despite their recent successes, the process of training GANs remains challenging, suffering from instability problems such as non-convergence, vanishing or exploding gradients, and mode collapse. In recent years, a diverse set of approaches have been proposed which focus on stabilizing the GAN training procedure. The purpose of this survey is to provide a comprehensive overview of the GAN training stabilization methods which can be found in the literature. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, offer a comparative summary, and conclude with a discussion of open problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
MethodsConvolution · Dogecoin Customer Service Number +1-833-534-1729
