
TL;DR
This paper studies the structure of rich words, showing that they can be extended in multiple ways within a linear bound, and establishes bounds on the minimal extension length needed for such properties.
Contribution
It improves the known upper bound on the extension length for rich words from 2n to n, and provides a lower bound proportional to n, for alphabets with at least two letters.
Findings
The upper bound on extension length is improved to n.
There exists a proportional lower bound for extension length, at least (2/9 - c)n.
Results apply to alphabets with at least two letters.
Abstract
A word is called rich if it contains palindromic factors, including the empty word. We say that a rich word can be extended in at least two ways if there are two distinct letters such that are rich. Let denote the set of all rich words. Given , let denote the set of all words such that if then and can be extended in at least two ways. Let and let , where . Vesti (2014) showed that . In other words, it says that for each there is a word with such that and can be extended in at least two ways. We prove that . In addition we prove that for each real constant and each integer there is such that $\phi(n)\geq…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
