Multi-season optical modulation phased with the orbit of the super-Earth 55 Cnc e

TL;DR

This study analyzes multi-year optical phase modulation of super-Earth 55 Cnc e, revealing variable amplitude and phase, constraining its albedo, and exploring possible causes like star-planet interaction or circumstellar dust.

Contribution

Introduces a new noise reduction technique for MOST data and provides a comprehensive multi-year analysis of 55 Cnc e's optical phase modulation.

Findings

Phase modulation amplitude varies from 28 to 113 ppm.

No secondary eclipse detected, albedo constrained below 0.47.

Modulation phase and amplitude change over years, suggesting complex physical processes.

Abstract

Context. 55 Cnc e is a transiting super-Earth orbiting a solar-like star with an orbital period of 17.7 hours. In 2011, using the MOST space telescope, a quasi-sinusoidal modulation in flux was detected with the same period as the planetary orbit. The amplitude of this modulation was too large to be explained as the change in light reflected or emitted by the planet. Aims. The MOST telescope continued to observe 55 Cnc e for a few weeks per year over five years, covering 143 individual transits. This paper presents the analysis of the observed phase modulation throughout these observations and a search for the secondary eclipse of the planet. Methods. The most important source of systematic noise in MOST data is due to stray-light reflected from the Earth, which is modulated with both the orbital period of the satellite and the Earth's rotation period. We present a new technique to deal with this source of noise, which we combined with standard detrending procedures for MOST data. We then performed Markov Chain Monte Carlo analyses of the detrended light curves, modeling the planetary transit and phase modulation. Results. We find phase modulations similar to those seen in 2011 in most of the subsequent years; however, the amplitude and phase of maximum light are seen to vary from 113 to 28 ppm and from 0.1 to 3.8 rad. The secondary eclipse is not detected, but we constrain the geometric albedo of the planet to less than 0.47 (2$\sigma$). Conclusions. While we cannot identify a single origin of the observed optical modulation, we propose a few possible scenarios. Those include star-planet interaction or the presence of a transiting circumstellar torus of dust. However, a detailed interpretation of these observations is limited by their photometric precision. Additional observations at optical wavelengths could contribute to uncovering the underlying physical processes.