Surface code dislocations have code distance L+O(1)
Craig Gidney

TL;DR
This paper revises the understanding of surface code dislocations' code distance, demonstrating that allowing Y errors reduces the code distance from 2L + O(1) to L + O(1).
Contribution
It corrects prior assumptions by showing the impact of Y errors on the code distance of surface code dislocations.
Findings
Code distance reduces from 2L + O(1) to L + O(1) with Y errors.
Y errors significantly affect the robustness of surface code dislocations.
The result impacts fault-tolerance thresholds for surface codes.
Abstract
In [Hastings et al 2014] it is stated that the code distance of a logical qubit stored using dislocations is 2L + O(1), where L is the separation between the dislocation twists. This code distance assumed only physical X and Z errors are permitted. This short note shows that, when Y errors are allowed, the code distance reduces to L + O(1). See Figure 1.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
