Comment on the recent article "Fission dynamics of from saddle to scission and beyond" by Bulgac et al., published in Phys. Rev. {\bf C 100}, 034615 (2019)
Sakir Ayik, Denis Lacroix

TL;DR
This paper responds to criticisms of the Stochastic Mean-Field (SMF) approach presented in a recent article, defending its validity and applications in nuclear fission dynamics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed rebuttal to critiques of the SMF method, clarifying its theoretical basis and defending its application in fission studies.
Findings
Rebuttal clarifies the validity of the SMF approach
Defends the application of SMF in fission dynamics
Addresses specific criticisms from the original article
Abstract
In this note we provide answers to criticisms made the appendix D of the article [Phys. Rev. C100, 034615 (2019)] against to the theory developed recently and known a "Stochastic Mean-Field" (SMF) approach and its applications. Briefly, we list our replies and leave the judgment to the readers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Nuclear physics research studies
