How accurately can we measure the baryon acoustic oscillation feature?
Rossana Ruggeri, Chris Blake

TL;DR
This paper critically examines how accurately the baryon acoustic oscillation feature can be measured, highlighting the impact of sample variance and noise on error estimates in galaxy surveys.
Contribution
It compares different methods of estimating BAO measurement errors, emphasizing the importance of accounting for sample noise and proposing a re-analysis of existing survey data.
Findings
Posterior-based error estimates are affected by sample noise.
Fisher matrix predictions differ from empirical error estimates.
Re-analysis clarifies the true uncertainty in BAO measurements.
Abstract
Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) represent one of the cleanest probes of dark energy, allowing for tests of the cosmological model through the measurement of distance and expansion rate from a 3D galaxy distribution. The signal appears at large scales in the correlation function where linear theory applies, allowing for the construction of accurate models. However, due to the lower number of modes available at these scales, sample variance has a significant impact on the signal, and may sharpen or widen the underlying peak. Therefore, equivalent mock realizations of a galaxy survey present different errors in the position of the peak when uncertainties are estimated from the posterior probability distribution corresponding to the individual mocks. Hence the posterior width, often quoted as the error in BAO survey measurements, is subject to sample noise. A different definition of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
