Suitability Analysis of Holographic vs Light Field and 2D Displays for Subjective Quality Assessment of Fourier Holograms
Ayyoub Ahar, Maksymilian Chlipala, Tobias Birnbaum, Weronika Zaperty,, Athanasia Symeonidou, Tomasz Kozacki, Malgorzata Kujawinska, Peter, Schelkens

TL;DR
This study compares holographic, light field, and 2D displays for visual quality assessment of Fourier holograms, revealing high correlation in perceived quality despite differences in artifact sensitivity.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive experimental validation of the suitability of light field and 2D displays as alternatives for holographic displays in quality assessment.
Findings
Non-holographic displays are more sensitive to artifacts.
High correlation between perceived quality on different display types.
Light field and 2D displays can predict holographic display quality.
Abstract
Visual quality assessment of digital holograms is facing many challenges. Main difficulties are related to the limited spatial resolution and angular field of view of holographic displays in combination with the complexity of steering and operating them for such tasks. Alternatively, non-holographic displays - and in particular light-field displays - can be utilized to visualize the numerically reconstructed content of a digital hologram. However, their suitability as alternative for holographic displays has not been validated. In this research, we have investigated this issue via a set of comprehensive experiments. We used Fourier holographic principle to acquire a diverse set of holograms, which were either computer-generated from point clouds or optically recorded from real macroscopic objects. A final public data set comprising 96 holograms was created using three compression…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
