Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps
Fabrizio Minganti, Adam Miranowicz, Ravindra W. Chhajlany, Franco Nori

TL;DR
This paper investigates the nature of exceptional points in quantum systems, comparing classical Hamiltonian EPs with Liouvillian EPs that include quantum jumps, and establishes conditions under which they are equivalent or different.
Contribution
It introduces a formal definition of EPs via Liouvillian degeneracies, proving their differences from Hamiltonian EPs in quantum regimes and their equivalence in the semiclassical limit.
Findings
LEPs and HEPs have different properties in the quantum limit.
In the semiclassical limit, LEPs and HEPs become equivalent.
Mathematical techniques reveal analogies and differences between LEPs and HEPs.
Abstract
Exceptional points (EPs) correspond to degeneracies of open systems. These are attracting much interest in optics, optoelectronics, plasmonics, and condensed matter physics. In the classical and semiclassical approaches, Hamiltonian EPs (HEPs) are usually defined as degeneracies of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians such that at least two eigenfrequencies are identical and the corresponding eigenstates coalesce. HEPs result from continuous, mostly slow, nonunitary evolution without quantum jumps. Clearly, quantum jumps should be included in a fully quantum approach to make it equivalent to, e.g., the Lindblad master-equation approach. Thus, we suggest to define EPs via degeneracies of a Liouvillian superoperator (including the full Lindbladian term, LEPs), and we clarify the relations between HEPs and LEPs. We prove two main theorems: Theorem 1 proves that, in the quantum limit, LEPs and HEPs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
