Sub-Chandrasekhar progenitors favoured for type Ia supernovae: Evidence from late-time spectroscopy
A. Fl\"ors, J. Spyromilio, S. Taubenberger, S. Blondin, R. Cartier, B., Leibundgut, L. Dessart, S. Dhawan, W. Hillebrandt

TL;DR
This study uses spectral modeling of Type Ia supernovae to determine Ni/Fe abundance ratios, providing evidence that most originate from sub-Chandrasekhar mass explosions, challenging traditional models.
Contribution
It introduces a spectral analysis method to distinguish between Chandrasekhar and sub-Chandrasekhar mass progenitors in SNe Ia.
Findings
85% of normal SNe Ia have Ni/Fe ratios consistent with sub-Chandrasekhar models.
Only 11% of SNe Ia match Chandrasekhar mass explosion predictions.
Spectral modeling effectively differentiates progenitor mass in supernovae.
Abstract
A non-local-thermodynamic-equilibrium (NLTE) level population model of the first and second ionisation stages of iron, nickel and cobalt is used to fit a sample of XShooter optical + near-infrared (NIR) spectra of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). From the ratio of the NIR lines to the optical lines limits can be placed on the temperature and density of the emission region. We find a similar evolution of these parameters across our sample. Using the evolution of the Fe II 12570to 7155line as a prior in fits of spectra covering only the optical wavelengths we show that the 7200feature is fully explained by [Fe II] and [Ni II] alone. This approach allows us to determine the abundance of Ni II/Fe II for a large sample of 130 optical spectra of 58 SNe Ia with uncertainties small enough to distinguish between Chandrasekhar mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
