Regression methods in waveform modeling: a comparative study
Yoshinta Setyawati, Michael P\"urrer, Frank Ohme

TL;DR
This study systematically compares various regression techniques for gravitational waveform modeling, highlighting that simpler methods often suffice, while more complex approaches may be beneficial for higher complexity problems.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison of multiple regression methods for gravitational waveform modeling, evaluating their accuracy and computational efficiency.
Findings
Most regression methods are reasonably accurate.
Simplicity often leads to better efficiency.
Complex methods may be advantageous for more complex problems.
Abstract
Gravitational-wave astronomy of compact binaries relies on theoretical models of the gravitational-wave signal that is emitted as binaries coalesce. These models do not only need to be accurate, they also have to be fast to evaluate in order to be able to compare millions of signals in near real time with the data of gravitational-wave instruments. A variety of regression and interpolation techniques have been employed to build efficient waveform models, but no study has systematically compared the performance of these regression methods yet. Here we provide such a comparison of various techniques, including polynomial fits, radial basis functions, Gaussian process regression and artificial neural networks, specifically for the case of gravitational waveform modeling. We use all these techniques to regress analytical models of non-precessing and precessing binary black hole waveforms,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
