Towards a 1% Measurement of the Hubble Constant: Accounting for Time Dilation in Variable Star Light Curves
Richard I. Anderson

TL;DR
This paper identifies a systematic bias in measuring the Hubble constant caused by redshift-induced period dilation of variable stars, proposes a correction method, and refines the $H_0$ estimate accounting for this bias.
Contribution
It introduces the Redshift-Leavitt bias (RLB), quantifies its impact on $H_0$ measurements, and suggests a correction procedure to improve accuracy in the cosmic distance ladder.
Findings
RLB causes a systematic underestimation of $H_0$ by about 0.27%.
Correcting for RLB adjusts $H_0$ to approximately 73.70 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}.
Redshift correction of variable star periods is essential for precise cosmological measurements.
Abstract
Assessing the significance and implications of the recently established Hubble tension requires the comprehensive identification, quantification, and mitigation of uncertainties and/or biases affecting measurements. Here, we investigate the previously overlooked distance scale bias resulting from the interplay between redshift and Leavitt laws in an expanding Universe: Redshift-Leavitt bias (RLB). Redshift dilates oscillation periods of pulsating stars residing in supernova-host galaxies relative to periods of identical stars residing in nearby (anchor) galaxies. Multiplying dilated with Leavitt Law slopes leads to underestimated absolute magnitudes, overestimated distance moduli, and a systematic error on . Emulating the SH0ES distance ladder, we estimate an associated bias of % and obtain a corrected $H_0 = (73.70 \pm 1.40) \rm{km s^{-1}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
